Is LeetCode Still Worth Preparing in 2026?
I’ve been seeing a lot of mixed opinions around interview prep lately.
Some people say LeetCode is still the fastest way to pass SWE interviews. Others say interviews are shifting toward more practical coding, debugging, system design, project deep dives, AI tooling, and production tradeoff discussions.
My current guess is:
LeetCode is not dead, but it is no longer enough by itself.
For new grad and junior SWE roles, classic coding questions still seem very important. For mid-level roles, coding is still common, but system design and practical implementation matter more. For senior / staff / infra / AI roles, I’m seeing more debugging, system design, architecture tradeoffs, and real-world engineering judgment.
I’m opening this thread to collect recent data points from people who interviewed in 2025–2026.
If you recently interviewed, please share:
- Company:
- Role:
- Level:
- Year / month:
- Round type:
- Was it LeetCode-style, practical coding, debugging, system design, project deep dive, or AI/ML-focused?
- What did the interviewer seem to care about most?
- How would you prep differently if you had to do it again?
A few discussion questions:
- Are classic LeetCode-style questions still common in your recent interviews?
- Which companies still ask mostly algorithmic coding?
- Which companies are moving toward practical coding or debugging?
- For senior / staff candidates, is system design now the main signal?
- For AI / ML / infra roles, are interviews shifting toward applied systems and project depth?
- If someone has limited prep time, how should they split time between LeetCode, system design, projects, and AI tools?
I’ll try to summarize the useful patterns from this thread over time so future candidates can get a clearer picture of what interview prep actually looks like now.
Sign in to join the discussion
Reply with context, advice, or a follow-up question.
Discussion
3 commentsStill worth it, actually there are not many of good ways to screen candidates
My own current take: I would not stop preparing LeetCode completely. For most SWE roles, especially new grad / junior / mid-level, coding rounds are still a major filter. But I also would not spend 100% of prep time grinding random problems anymore. A more balanced split might be something like: * New grad / junior: mostly LeetCode + fundamentals * Mid-level: LeetCode + practical coding + basic system design * Senior: coding enough to pass + strong system design + project deep dives * Staff / infra / AI infra: architecture, debugging, tradeoffs, reliability, scalability, and communication The biggest change I’m seeing is that “can you solve the problem” is no longer the only signal. Interviewers increasingly care about how you reason, test, debug, explain tradeoffs, and connect the solution to production constraints.
Great write-ups